Hi Edie, I’m sure you probably know this, but Sex Matters writes handbooks on gender identity ideology and the media etc. The Coalition for biological reality or Women’s Forum Aust or other groups may be interested in producing this sort of guidance for the media or education sectors in Australia.
Yes I have been talking to people about some of these tings, I'm sure I could find a role. I am getting more focused on a speciality. I was trying to take a broader approach but gender just keeps sucking me back in.
Certainly wish you well in your endeavors. As Margaret Mead put it, "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has."
But more apropos of your "erased women and are calling for submissions", you might find some interest and value in my submission to Canada's Statistics Department in response to their call for "consultation on gender and sexual diversity statistical metadata standards":
Talk about "capture" by transgender ideology; hard to believe that such a pile of unscientific if not anti-scientific claptrap could find any audience much less support in an ostensibly scientific organization of government.
I'd written a short Substack post on the rot that transgenderism has wrought -- so to speak -- in Canada's Statistics Department as well as in those of Britain and New Zealand. But you might have particular interest in New Zealand's given their definition of "lesbian" as "A woman who is sexually attracted to people of the same sex or gender", the latter term apparently encompassing those sporting penises:
Amen to that. Though big problem is that so many of us are scientifically illiterate; Carl Sagan in his Demon-Haunted World (still the case) suggested some 90% or more. Makes us easy marks for charlatans, grifters, & political opportunists.
But ran across a very good if lengthy (78 minute read) Substack post by Carol Dansereau on "The Anti-Science Disaster of Gender Ideology in the Schools" that you might have some interest in as well:
Generally very good, though as I argue in that comment, I think she's somewhat wide of the mark in promoting some definitions for the sexes that really don't square with the standard definitions of biology.
Hi Edie, there are quite a few independent candidates here in Victoria who are against Daniel Andrews conversation therapy legislation and school ideology. Also the local Liberal candidate was against it. Perhaps you could contact your local independent councillors or Liberal candidate? I wish you all the very best.
Hi Edie, I’m sure you probably know this, but Sex Matters writes handbooks on gender identity ideology and the media etc. The Coalition for biological reality or Women’s Forum Aust or other groups may be interested in producing this sort of guidance for the media or education sectors in Australia.
Yes I have been talking to people about some of these tings, I'm sure I could find a role. I am getting more focused on a speciality. I was trying to take a broader approach but gender just keeps sucking me back in.
Certainly wish you well in your endeavors. As Margaret Mead put it, "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has."
But more apropos of your "erased women and are calling for submissions", you might find some interest and value in my submission to Canada's Statistics Department in response to their call for "consultation on gender and sexual diversity statistical metadata standards":
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kRIpfkx0sq8y0nC7HBK6GyMiI_SUv_zv/view
Talk about "capture" by transgender ideology; hard to believe that such a pile of unscientific if not anti-scientific claptrap could find any audience much less support in an ostensibly scientific organization of government.
I'd written a short Substack post on the rot that transgenderism has wrought -- so to speak -- in Canada's Statistics Department as well as in those of Britain and New Zealand. But you might have particular interest in New Zealand's given their definition of "lesbian" as "A woman who is sexually attracted to people of the same sex or gender", the latter term apparently encompassing those sporting penises:
https://humanuseofhumanbeings.substack.com/p/statistics-departments-corrupted
Tans I'll have a look, the corruption is so real and obvious when you take your goggles off.
Amen to that. Though big problem is that so many of us are scientifically illiterate; Carl Sagan in his Demon-Haunted World (still the case) suggested some 90% or more. Makes us easy marks for charlatans, grifters, & political opportunists.
But ran across a very good if lengthy (78 minute read) Substack post by Carol Dansereau on "The Anti-Science Disaster of Gender Ideology in the Schools" that you might have some interest in as well:
https://caroldansereau.substack.com/p/the-anti-science-disaster-of-gender/comment/11059512
Generally very good, though as I argue in that comment, I think she's somewhat wide of the mark in promoting some definitions for the sexes that really don't square with the standard definitions of biology.
Hi Edie, there are quite a few independent candidates here in Victoria who are against Daniel Andrews conversation therapy legislation and school ideology. Also the local Liberal candidate was against it. Perhaps you could contact your local independent councillors or Liberal candidate? I wish you all the very best.
Yes I am sure I could provide a useful base for some of these people. I have a little plan I am hatching. *insert evil laugh*